From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Sieka Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:36:09 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [new uImage] rework error handling so common functions don't reset In-Reply-To: <20080222115000.3517F243AB@gemini.denx.de> References: <20080222115000.3517F243AB@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <47BEDDD9.1080007@semihalf.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar, > > in message you wrote: >> Changed image_get_ramdisk() to just return NULL on error and have >> get_ramdisk() propogate that error to the caller. It's left to the >> caller to call do_reset() if it wants to. >> >> Also moved calling do_reset() in get_fdt() on ppc to a common location. >> In the future we will change get_fdt() to return success/failure and >> not call do_reset() at all. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > > Just to make my position clear: I expect that you negotiate new-image > related patches more or less directly with Bartek, who I consider as > kind of "new-image" custodian. > > That means that I will not track the state of these patches - if you > want me to apply something directly, please ring a bell. > > Bartek: I would also appreciate if you could merge Kumar's patches in > a local repo and then send me just a pull request when something is > ready to go into u-boot-testing (or even into mainline). OK, will coordinate new uImage stuff that gets posted to the list, and request pulling as needed. Regards, Bartlomiej