From: Scott McNutt <smcnutt@psyent.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ARM: test_and_set_bit
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:38:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D05648.8080508@psyent.com> (raw)
In asm-arm/bitops.h:
The test_and_set_bit() function is declared, but not implemented
inline as in other architectures. However, the function
__test_and_set_bit() is defined (inline) but never referenced.
From a practical point-of-view, this only appears to affect
ext2_set_bit() as used in net/tftp.c for Multicast TFTP.
Does anyone see any reason why we can't just remove the leading
underscores for the __test_and_xxx_bit routines in asm-arm/bitops.h ?
i.e. is this just an oversight? ... or is there some other
motivation that I don't understand (yet)? ;-)
Regards,
--Scott
reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D05648.8080508@psyent.com \
--to=smcnutt@psyent.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox