public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] ARM: test_and_set_bit
@ 2008-03-06 20:38 Scott McNutt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Scott McNutt @ 2008-03-06 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

In asm-arm/bitops.h:

The test_and_set_bit() function is declared, but not implemented
inline as in other architectures. However, the function
__test_and_set_bit() is defined (inline) but never referenced.

 From a practical point-of-view, this only appears to affect
ext2_set_bit() as used in net/tftp.c for Multicast TFTP.

Does anyone see any reason why we can't just remove the leading
underscores for the __test_and_xxx_bit routines in asm-arm/bitops.h ?
i.e. is this just an oversight? ... or is there some other
motivation that I don't understand (yet)? ;-)

Regards,
--Scott

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-03-06 20:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-06 20:38 [U-Boot-Users] ARM: test_and_set_bit Scott McNutt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox