From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott McNutt <smcnutt@psyent.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:38:32 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ARM: test_and_set_bit
Message-ID: <47D05648.8080508@psyent.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

In asm-arm/bitops.h:

The test_and_set_bit() function is declared, but not implemented
inline as in other architectures. However, the function
__test_and_set_bit() is defined (inline) but never referenced.

 From a practical point-of-view, this only appears to affect
ext2_set_bit() as used in net/tftp.c for Multicast TFTP.

Does anyone see any reason why we can't just remove the leading
underscores for the __test_and_xxx_bit routines in asm-arm/bitops.h ?
i.e. is this just an oversight? ... or is there some other
motivation that I don't understand (yet)? ;-)

Regards,
--Scott