From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:39:26 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function
In-Reply-To: <20080326110012.78be5034@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com>
References: <47E472FD.7010907@gmail.com>	<47E49320.1080504@ruby.dti.ne.jp>	<47E52BEB.90600@comsys.ro>	<47E5F68B.503@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
	<20080326110012.78be5034@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com>
Message-ID: <47EA35EE.40804@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Having a header file full of driver-specific declarations does increase
> the chances of conflicts, but I think it's worth it. It's definitely an
> improvement over the old code. And the conflicts will be absolutely
> trivial.

I just thought that, a header file full of driver-specific declarations,
is somewhat ugly. But I don't have a definite opinion now, so will leave
this up to everyone.

Thanks,

  Shinya