From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:31:59 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] LZMA support (patch)
In-Reply-To: <1206724722.23627.28.camel@localhost>
References: <1206718963.23627.16.camel@localhost>
	<1206724722.23627.28.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <47ED2B8F.3020002@ge.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> this patch adds the lzma support with the following constraints:
> 
>  - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the import_lzma.sh
> script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release
>  - the imported lzma sdk files are _not touched_
>  - the lzma support is enabled defining the CONFIG_LZMA define
>  - I haven't tested this patch
>  - ?Use this patch at your own risk
> 
> The patch creates:
> 
>  - the lib_lzma directory with the import_lzmasdk.sh script and a simple
> front-end to LzmaDecode() fuction
>  - the include/lzma directory with some include files to use in the
> U-Boot code
> 
> modifies:
> 
>  - common/do_bootm.c file
>  - common/image.c file
>  - include/image.h file
> 
> Please read the lib_lzma/README.txt file.
> 
> Luigi

Hi Luigi,

I have a stupid question in return: why do we want lzma (7zip) added to 
u-boot?  The linux/uboot world is dominated by gzip.  I realize 7zip has 
advantages over gzip albeit incremental, not revolutionary IIRC.

I am not aware of proposals or implementations of kernels compressed 
with lzma (could well be my ignorance).  Adding more code for minimal 
benefits is a hard sell (we already have plenty of bloat :-O).

Best regards,
gvb