From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:40:24 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: make new image support mandatory
In-Reply-To: <1207041998.12115.8.camel@localhost>
References: <20080326141644.D180D243A7@gemini.denx.de>	
	<20080326164102.58905a27@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com>	
	<47EA7A6C.3050301@semihalf.com>
	<1207041998.12115.8.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <47F20308.5050007@semihalf.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej,
> 
> I posted a week ago some considerations about the new image format (with
> subject "[U-Boot-Users] New Image format: headers hashes."). Please,
> can you give an your opinion about these consideration? I'm really
> interested to support new image in my firmwares, but I need to
> understand if the new format is "robust" respect to the accidental
> errors.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your work and your answers on the ml.

Hi Luigi,

Sorry for being slow to respond -- I'm processing ML comments on the new
image, and will reply to your postings today/tomorrow.

Regards,
Bartlomiej