From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] New Image format: headers hashes.
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:31:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F4A3FC.5000401@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206634003.13666.14.camel@localhost>
Hi Luigi,
You wrote:
> On gio, 2008-03-27 at 12:13 +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
>
>>
>> - The mkimage calculate hashes before that timestamp is added to
>> image.
>> is it better exchange the order of these operations (before add
>> timestamp then calculate hashes)?
Please see below.
>> - Does the new format assure that the complete image (_all_ sections,
>> images, ramdisks, configurations, blobs) are covered by at least an
>> hash
>> value?
Currently, the hash calculation is performed only over binary data of
component images (kernel, ramdisk, fdt, etc). In particular, timestamp
information is not protected by the hash, so the ordering of hash
calculation and timestamp addition doesn't matter.
>> should mkimage add at least a hash value for the root node?
Adding a hash value for the root node only will not be easy. An easier
approach I think would be to add a hash value for the entire FIT image.
> In addition to the previous question:
>
> - I'm interested to calculate and store from U-boot code but the
> fit_image_set_hashes is compiled only when the USE_HOSTCC symbol is
> defined. Why? Is there a particular reason?
There's no need for the function that you mention in current U-Boot
code, that's the reason why it's under USE_HOSTCC. If you're planning on
adding code to U-Boot that will use fit_image_set_hashes(), then just
remove the USE_HOSTCC #define's from around this function.
> I think that a lot of
> useful functions (ifdef-ed by USE_HOSTCC) should be available also in
> u-boot code, anyway the linker will drop the unused functions.
I don't think the linker will do this in case of U-Boot:
With the following patch:
diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c
index f04826a..850a9e4 100644
--- a/common/image.c
+++ b/common/image.c
@@ -1950,7 +1950,6 @@ static int calculate_hash (const void *data, int
data_len,
return 0;
}
-#ifdef USE_HOSTCC
/**
* fit_set_hashes - process FIT component image nodes and calculate hashes
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
@@ -2119,7 +2118,6 @@ int fit_image_hash_set_value (void *fit, int
noffset, uint
return 0;
}
-#endif /* USE_HOSTCC */
/**
* fit_image_check_hashes - verify data intergity
I see:
$ ${CROSS_COMPILE}nm -S common/image.o | grep fit_image_set_hashes
0000155c 000001f4 T fit_image_set_hashes
$ ${CROSS_COMPILE}nm -S common/libcommon.a | grep fit_image_set_hashes
0000155c 000001f4 T fit_image_set_hashes
$ ${CROSS_COMPILE}nm -S u-boot | grep fit_image_set_hashes
fffb1924 000001f4 T fit_image_set_hashes
There's also size increase with the patch applied:
text data bss dec hex filename
284615 15556 357120 657291 a078b ./u-boot
text data bss dec hex filename
285875 15572 357120 658567 a0c87 u-boot
HTH,
Bartlomiej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-27 11:13 [U-Boot-Users] New Image format: headers hashes Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2008-03-27 16:06 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2008-03-27 22:26 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2008-04-03 9:31 ` Bartlomiej Sieka [this message]
2008-04-03 9:51 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2008-04-03 11:48 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-04-03 12:55 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F4A3FC.5000401@semihalf.com \
--to=tur@semihalf.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox