From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:06:04 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for u-boot in svn
 and	localversion-* files
In-Reply-To: <20080409174555.GC28294@game.jcrosoft.org>
References: <20080408210433.AC07424842@gemini.denx.de>
	<47FBE16F.9030003@gmail.com>
	<62330506-2BC7-4475-B394-EA38443308FB@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20080409174555.GC28294@game.jcrosoft.org>
Message-ID: <47FD058C.4000703@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 16:49 Tue 08 Apr     , Kumar Gala wrote:
>   
>> On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
>>     
>>> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>       
>>>> In message <1207677657-31722-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>  
>>>> you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Hm... is anybody using SVN for U-Boot?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Wolfgang Denk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I used it at my last company and will most certainly use it again, and
>>> appreciate this patch.  I think it's very popular in companies that
>>> prefer free, more traditional revision control.
>>>       
>> bah, use git :)
>>     
>
> Yeah, use git or at least git-svn
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>
>   
Easy to say, isn't it.  OTOH, this patch doesn't really add complexity, 
doesn't increase code size and nobody gets hurt.  Why not include it?

regards,
Ben