From: Andre Schwarz <andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] I2C @ MPC8343
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:13:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FE0481.6020202@matrix-vision.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F3F98010FF784EBEE6526EAAB078D10635DEF2@tq-mailsrv.tq-net.de>
Martin,
thanks for your hints.
Martin Krause schrieb:
> Hi Andre,
>
> u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net wrote on :
>
>> All,
>>
>> in my current system the I2C bus is not working properly on a MPC8343
>> in
>> u-boot v1.3.2.
>>
>> i2c board config includes :
>>
>> #define CONFIG_HARD_I2C
>> #undef CONFIG_SOFT_I2C
>> #define CONFIG_FSL_I2C
>> #define CONFIG_I2C_MULTI_BUS
>> #define CONFIG_I2C_CMD_TREE
>> #define CFG_I2C_OFFSET 0x3000
>> #define CFG_I2C2_OFFSET 0x3100
>> #define CFG_I2C_SPEED 100000
>> #define CFG_I2C_SLAVE 0x7F
>>
>>
>> chip probing works fine.
>>
>> mvBL-M7> i2c probe
>> Valid chip addresses: 30 48 50 68
>>
>> reading the Chips gives all "ff"
>>
>> mvBL-M7> i2c md 50 0 10
>>
>
> Uh, it seems I lag behind in U-Boot evolution. I know this
> "i2c md" command as "imd"?
>
>
>> 0000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ................
>>
>
> Devices with address 50 normally are EEPROMs. If this device is an
> EEPROM, are you sure it contains data other than 0xff?
>
>
Yes - it's the configuration data of the CPU.
I can see the transaction on the bus - all data is correct. U-boot shows
0xff.
> The number of address bytes a device needs is varying. Your could
> look up the correct address length in the datasheet of your device,
> or try it manually:
>
> imd 50.0 0 10
> imd 50.1 0 10
> imd 50.2 0 10
>
> One of this should work.
>
>
no - only 0xff.
Scope shows valid I2C transactions with correct data.
>> Observing the I2C bus wires show that everything _works excellent_ :
>> 100kHz speed as well as all data seems ok - but u-boot shows "ff".
>>
>> BTW: Fetching HRCW from I2C is also working fine.
>>
>> After some tries (i2c md ..) the bus hangs and no more transactions
>> can
>> be seen on the bus.
>>
>
> One reason for a hanging bus could be a lost clock pulse. This could
> happen, if the low->high rise time of the bus signal is longer than
> the clock pulse width. For testing you could try a lower bus clock
> (10 kHz for example).
>
>
rise time is ~200ns.
> Best Regards,
> Martin Krause
> --
> TQ-Systems GmbH
> Muehlstrasse 2, Gut Delling, D-82229 Seefeld
> Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 105 018, UST-IdNr. DE 811 607 913
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Detlef Schneider, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Ruediger Stahl
> http://www.tq-group.com
>
MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstra?e 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler - Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080410/49ab5ff0/attachment.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 8:37 [U-Boot-Users] I2C @ MPC8343 Andre Schwarz
2008-04-10 11:08 ` Martin Krause
2008-04-10 11:19 ` w.wegner at astro-kom.de
2008-04-10 12:17 ` Andre Schwarz
2008-04-10 12:13 ` Andre Schwarz [this message]
2008-04-10 14:03 ` Martin Krause
2008-04-10 11:33 ` Ben Warren
2008-04-10 12:27 ` Andre Schwarz
2008-04-10 14:09 ` Ben Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FE0481.6020202@matrix-vision.de \
--to=andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox