From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:13:01 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm
In-Reply-To: <000301c89bd0$21749350$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com>
References: <000301c89bd0$21749350$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com>
Message-ID: <47FF63DD.3020806@ge.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Peter Pearse wrote:

[snip]

> I understand now that I should only apply *completely* unmodified patches.
> 
> I shall investigate how I can obtain patches in an uncorrupted form and 
> inform the patch originators when I have done so.
> 
> I may have to change my email address to do so.
> 
> Could I appeal to other u-boot guardians to send me, off list, details
> of which applications they have found reliable for both sending
> & receiving git patches.
>  
> Regards
> 
> Peter

[snip]

http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Email_Clients_and_Patches

FWIIW, if your Exchange server is configured to support IMAP, you can 
use Thunderbird.  It isn't the best client, but at least can be 
configured to work and doesn't spindle and mutilate received patches.

Best regards,
gvb