From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:22:06 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm In-Reply-To: <000901c89bd8$1b35a1c0$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com> References: <000901c89bd8$1b35a1c0$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com> Message-ID: <48075D0E.8050501@googlemail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Peter Pearse wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de] >>Sent: 11 April 2008 14:18 >>To: Peter Pearse >>Cc: 'Guennadi Liakhovetski'; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net >>Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm >> >>In message <000301c89bd0$21749350$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com> you wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>>Actually, I think, even Peter should not reset his tree, >> >>but revert >> >>>>just as well as you are going to do it: his tree is publically >>>>accessible too, and if he resets his tree, it will become >> >>unclear, >> >>>>where respective commits from the central tree come from. >>> >>>Agreed. >>> >>>I shall revert u-boot-arm commits in the order listed. >> >>OK, I reverted the commits in the master branch now. > > > And I've reverted u-boot-arm What's the status of re-applying the reverted patches? I really like to see [PATCH v2] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/38505 in mainline. Sorry if I missed anything, Dirk