From: Larry Johnson <lrj@acm.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PCI stopped working on MPC8343
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:17:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4808AD5C.8080202@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480883E6.5000304@matrix-vision.de>
Andre Schwarz wrote:
> Last week
> my PCI bus has been running fine showing all devices.
> Right now no devices are shown on the bus.
>
> I'm using CONFIG_83XX_GENERIC_PCI with common setup code for PCI.
>
> Nothing changed from my side during the last 2 weeks.
>
>
> Did I miss any changes in u-boot ?
>
>
> regards,
> Andre Schwarz
> Matrix Vision
Hi Andre and everyone,
I was just about to post on I problem I belatedly found with PCI on our
Korat PPC400EPx board. (I believe the same problem exists on the
Sequoia board, but have not proved it.) What appears to have broken it
was the following patch (I got to use "git bisect" for the first time):
<patch>
commit 55774b512fdf63c0516d441cc5da7c54bbffb7f2
Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
Date: Fri Mar 7 16:04:25 2008 +0900
pci: Add CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE config option
In current source code, when the device number of PCI is 0, process PCI
bridge without fail. However, when the device number is 0, it is not PCI
always bridge. There are times when device of PCI allocates.
When CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is enable, this problem is solved when
use this patch.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 50ca6b0..7944b66 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -425,6 +425,9 @@ int pci_hose_scan_bus(struct pci_controller *hose, int bus)
dev < PCI_BDF(bus,PCI_MAX_PCI_DEVICES-1,PCI_MAX_PCI_FUNCTIONS-1);
dev += PCI_BDF(0,0,1))
{
+
+ /* Bus 0 is not necessarily PCI bridge. */
+#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
/* Skip our host bridge */
if ( dev == PCI_BDF(hose->first_busno,0,0) ) {
#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_CONFIG_HOST_BRIDGE) /* don't skip host bridge */
@@ -434,10 +437,11 @@ int pci_hose_scan_bus(struct pci_controller *hose, int bus)
if (getenv("pciconfighost") == NULL) {
continue; /* Skip our host bridge */
}
-#else
+#else /* CONFIG_PCI_CONFIG_HOST_BRIDGE */
continue; /* Skip our host bridge */
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_CONFIG_HOST_BRIDGE */
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE */
if (PCI_FUNC(dev) && !found_multi)
continue;
@@ -473,8 +477,11 @@ int pci_hose_scan_bus(struct pci_controller *hose, int bus)
hose->fixup_irq(hose, dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_SCAN_SHOW
+#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
/* Skip our host bridge */
- if ( dev != PCI_BDF(hose->first_busno,0,0) ) {
+ if ( dev != PCI_BDF(hose->first_busno,0,0) )
+#endif
+ {
unsigned char int_line;
pci_hose_read_config_byte(hose, dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE,
</patch>
The patch changes the behavior of the code _unless_
CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is defined. Defining that switch in the
Korat configuration fixes the problem. The MPC8323ERDB configuration
has also been patched to add the switch, so maybe this is is the cause
of your problem as well.
I was going to submit the patch for Korat, but then decided I'd first
like to ask Nobuhiro and the group whether it might not be better to
change the occurrences of
#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
in "drivers/pci/pci.c" to
#if !defined(CONFIG_PCI_NO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
That would allow those boards that need to patch to specify it
explicity, while leaving the default functionality unchanged.
Comments?
Best regards,
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 11:20 [U-Boot-Users] PCI stopped working on MPC8343 Andre Schwarz
2008-04-18 14:17 ` Larry Johnson [this message]
2008-04-18 14:27 ` André Schwarz
2008-04-18 16:51 ` Larry Johnson
2008-04-18 14:57 ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-28 8:00 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge (Re: PCI stopped working on MPC8343) Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-05-05 15:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge Larry Johnson
2008-05-05 18:41 ` Stefan Roese
2008-05-07 16:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-09 2:01 ` Larry Johnson
2008-05-11 23:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-05-12 13:43 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-05-12 18:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-17 4:59 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-06-17 6:39 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Add check PCI bridge class (Re: [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge) Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 13:58 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-08 6:51 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-08 9:27 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-05 22:32 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4808AD5C.8080202@acm.org \
--to=lrj@acm.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox