public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Johnson <lrj@acm.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 11:34:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <481F28FC.3040103@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428170042.386ac2d6.iwamatsu@nigauri.org>

Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi, all.
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:57:15 +0200
> Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> 
>>> The patch changes the behavior of the code _unless_
>>> CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is defined.  Defining that switch in the
>>> Korat configuration fixes the problem.  The MPC8323ERDB configuration
>>> has also been patched to add the switch, so maybe this is is the cause
>>> of your problem as well.
>>>
>>> I was going to submit the patch for Korat, but then decided I'd first
>>> like to ask Nobuhiro and the group whether it might not be better to
>>> change the occurrences of
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
>>>
>>> in "drivers/pci/pci.c" to
>>>
>>> #if !defined(CONFIG_PCI_NO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE)
>>>
>>> That would allow those boards that need to patch to specify it
>>> explicity, while leaving the default functionality unchanged.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>> Yes, I totally agree. Patches should *not* change the default behavior. We 
>> should change it as you suggested. Sorry, I must have missed this.
>>
>> Nobuhiro, could you please send a new patch to fix this problem?
> 
> Thank you for your check.
> It has troubled you with my patch. 
> 
> I rewirte new patch . Could you please check this patch and confirming the work?
> 
> Best regards,
>  Nobuhiro 

Hi Nobuhiro, Stefan, and everyone,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.  My mail reader thinks your 
patch is part of your signature, so I missed it the first time around.

I did a quick check using the Sequoia board, and it looks like the patch 
isn't working there.  U-Boot is reporting the class of the bridge as 
"0680", which I assume is why the patch doesn't skip it.

Nobuhiro and Stefan, do you think we can get a working fix for this into 
1.3.3 (even if it is not the final fix)?  If not, we should patch 
Sequoia and Korat to add CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE so they won't be 
broken in that release.

Best regards,
Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-05 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-18 11:20 [U-Boot-Users] PCI stopped working on MPC8343 Andre Schwarz
2008-04-18 14:17 ` Larry Johnson
2008-04-18 14:27   ` André Schwarz
2008-04-18 16:51     ` Larry Johnson
2008-04-18 14:57   ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-28  8:00     ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge (Re: PCI stopped working on MPC8343) Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-05-05 15:34       ` Larry Johnson [this message]
2008-05-05 18:41         ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge Stefan Roese
2008-05-07 16:31           ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-09  2:01             ` Larry Johnson
2008-05-11 23:13             ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-05-12 13:43         ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-05-12 18:32           ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-06-17  4:59             ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-06-17  6:39               ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Add check PCI bridge class (Re: [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge) Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-07 13:58                 ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-08  6:51                   ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2008-07-08  9:27                     ` Stefan Roese
2008-07-05 22:32               ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=481F28FC.3040103@acm.org \
    --to=lrj@acm.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox