From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:44:09 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][resubmit] MPC85xx,
 MPC83xx: Add/Fix UPM configuration support
In-Reply-To: <3026DA9FE767E2418FA2C568FE4F5CB17713D3C354@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
References: <3026DA9FE767E2418FA2C568FE4F5CB17713D3C2F7@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
	<4831D5C6.4000106@ge.com>
	<3026DA9FE767E2418FA2C568FE4F5CB17713D3C354@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
Message-ID: <4832C799.6060409@ge.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

David Saada wrote:
>  > Bad news, David, I think I mislead you with my Option #1 - it looks
>  > sorta OK, but it still is full of bad stuff, including line wraps, when
>  > you look at the actual text of the email.
> .
> .
> .
>  > Sorry for getting your hopes up.  Try finding an open port 25.  :-/
>  >
> That's pretty strange, as I managed to apply the patch after receiving 
> my own mail. I also diffed it with my original patch file, and no 
> difference was found (it wasn't so in the past).
> Also, in the past, when I had wrapping problems, I got the patch all 
> wrapped up in the daily list mail, but here it was fine?
> Well, will try to look for that 25 port?
> Regards,
> David.

OK, it is possible my end messed it up or that I'm just confused.  Since 
nobody else hollared on the list, it is probably my bad.  I did not 
check at home where I have a sane email stack.  :-/

gvb