From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:07:09 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading from
 NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds)
In-Reply-To: <C469BC0E.F875%gerickson@nuovations.com>
References: <C469BC0E.F875%gerickson@nuovations.com>
Message-ID: <48446F0D.4030205@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Grant Erickson wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there
> any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously
> chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?

I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved.  Does anyone 
actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands 
(intentionally, that is)?  If the answer is no, then we could make it 
the default.

-Scott