From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:02:02 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] fdt: add crypto node handling for
	MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors
In-Reply-To: <20080610215242.947ac5d2.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
References: <20080610215242.947ac5d2.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <484F402A.6010400@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Kim Phillips wrote:
> crypto node if not on an E-processor.  If on 8360 or 834x family,
> check rev and up-rev crypto node (to SEC rev. 2.4 property values)
> if on an 'EA' processor, e.g. MPC8349EA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
> ---
> change since v1: mpc85xx IS_E_PROCESSOR(svr) definition changed to (svr
> & 0x80000).
> 
> (I'm not sure, but I think this goes through WD directly)
> 
>  common/fdt_support.c        |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I'm not really competent to evaluate this beyond the obvious criteria 
(it compiles and passes the sniff test).  From the libfdt point of view, 
I'm OK with Wolfgang applying the patch directly.

Best regards,
gvb