public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
@ 2008-06-11 13:00 Antonio R. Costa
  2008-06-16  8:58 ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-06-11 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Logic unit:
Purpose:    Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
Author:     Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
Date  :     11 Jun 2008

Status:
~~~~~~
Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.

I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.

Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>

diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
--- a/disk/part_dos.c
+++ b/disk/part_dos.c
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 /*
+ * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
+ * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
+ *                  <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com>
  * (C) Copyright 2001
  * Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com
  * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
@@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned char *le32)
 	   );
 }
 
+static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
+{
+    return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
+}
+
 static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
 {
     return (part_type == 0x5 ||
@@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
 	unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
 	dos_partition_t *pt;
 	int i;
-
+	
 	if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector, 1, (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
 		printf ("** Can't read partition table on %d:%d **\n",
 			dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
 		return -1;
 	}
+
+/* 
+ * ARC:	This check is bad: 
+ * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
+ * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
+ * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
+ * print_partition_extended
+ 
 	if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
 		buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
 		printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
@@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
 			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
 		return -1;
 	}
-
+*/
+	i=test_block_type(buffer);
+	
+	if(i==-1) {
+		printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
+			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
+			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
+		return -1;
+	}
+	
+	if(i==DOS_PBR)
+		return -1;
+	
 	/* Print all primary/logical partitions */
 	pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
 	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
@@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
 			info->blksz = 512;
 			info->start = ext_part_sector + le32_to_int (pt->start4);
 			info->size  = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
+
 			switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
 				case IF_TYPE_IDE:
 				case IF_TYPE_SATA:
@@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
 				case IF_TYPE_DOC:
 					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
 					break;
+				case IF_TYPE_MMC:
+					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
+					break;
+				case IF_TYPE_SD:
+				case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
+					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
+					break;
 				default:
 					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
 					break;
-- 
1.5.4.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
  2008-06-11 13:00 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support Antonio R. Costa
@ 2008-06-16  8:58 ` Michal Simek
  2008-06-16 12:15   ` Jerry Van Baren
       [not found]   ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2008-06-16  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Antonio

I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding style
violation.

Regards,
Michal Simek

> Logic unit:
> Purpose:    Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
> Author:     Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
> Date  :     11 Jun 2008
> 
> Status:
> ~~~~~~
> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
> 
> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
> 
> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>  /*
> + * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
> + * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
> + *                  <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com>

choose only one email

>   * (C) Copyright 2001
>   * Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com
>   * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
> @@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned char *le32)
>  	   );
>  }
>  
> +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
> +{
> +    return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
> +}
> +

this should be in header file

>  static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
>  {
>      return (part_type == 0x5 ||
> @@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>  	unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
>  	dos_partition_t *pt;
>  	int i;
> -
> +	

Coding style issue.

>  	if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector, 1, (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
>  		printf ("** Can't read partition table on %d:%d **\n",
>  			dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> +
> +/* 
> + * ARC:	This check is bad: 
> + * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
> + * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
> + * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
> + * print_partition_extended
> + 
>  	if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
>  		buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
>  		printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> @@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>  			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> -
> +*/
> +	i=test_block_type(buffer);
> +	
> +	if(i==-1) {
> +		printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> +			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
> +			buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	
> +	if(i==DOS_PBR)
> +		return -1;
> +	
>  	/* Print all primary/logical partitions */
>  	pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
>  	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
> @@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>  			info->blksz = 512;
>  			info->start = ext_part_sector + le32_to_int (pt->start4);
>  			info->size  = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
> +
>  			switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
>  				case IF_TYPE_IDE:
>  				case IF_TYPE_SATA:
> @@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>  				case IF_TYPE_DOC:
>  					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>  					break;
> +				case IF_TYPE_MMC:
> +					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> +					break;
> +				case IF_TYPE_SD:
> +				case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
> +					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> +					break;
>  				default:
>  					sprintf ((char *)info->name, "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>  					break;
> 
> 

Regards,
Michal Simek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
  2008-06-16  8:58 ` Michal Simek
@ 2008-06-16 12:15   ` Jerry Van Baren
  2008-06-17  7:19     ` Antonio R. Costa
       [not found]   ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2008-06-16 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Antonio
> 
> I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding style
> violation.
> 
> Regards,
> Michal Simek
> 
>> Logic unit:
>> Purpose:    Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
>> Author:     Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
>> Date  :     11 Jun 2008
>>
>> Status:
>> ~~~~~~
>> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
>> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>>
>> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
>> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
>> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
>> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
>> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
>> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c

[snip]

>> +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
>> +{
>> +    return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
>> +}
>> +
> 
> this should be in header file

Please use <asm/byteorder.h> rather than making Yet Another Define. 
Note that the subdirectory asm gets symlinked to the appropriate 
arch-specific subdirectory and then the right endian munching is 
selected and it Just Works[tm].

PowerPC example:
<http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=include/asm-ppc/byteorder.h;h=3f5bcf63a1f980eb0c5e95e458119f55f5855274;hb=HEAD>

[snip]

> Regards,
> Michal Simek

Thanks,
gvb

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
  2008-06-16 12:15   ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2008-06-17  7:19     ` Antonio R. Costa
  2008-08-01 22:43       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-06-17  7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

2008/6/16 Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>:

> Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> Hi Antonio
>>
>> I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding
>> style
>> violation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michal Simek
>>
>>  Logic unit:
>>> Purpose:    Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
>>> Author:     Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
>>> Date  :     11 Jun 2008
>>>
>>> Status:
>>> ~~~~~~
>>> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
>>> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>>>
>>> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
>>> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
>>> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
>>> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
>>> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
>>> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
>>>
>>
> [snip]
>
>  +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
>>> +{
>>> +    return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>>
>> this should be in header file
>>
>
> Please use <asm/byteorder.h> rather than making Yet Another Define. Note
> that the subdirectory asm gets symlinked to the appropriate arch-specific
> subdirectory and then the right endian munching is selected and it Just
> Works[tm].
>
> PowerPC example:
> <
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=include/asm-ppc/byteorder.h;h=3f5bcf63a1f980eb0c5e95e458119f55f5855274;hb=HEAD
> >
>


Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in fact
at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
definition.
Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.

In these cases is there a special manner to format the subject to make an
explicit reference to a patched patch :) ?

Regards,
Antonio


>
> [snip]
>
>  Regards,
>> Michal Simek
>>
>
> Thanks,
> gvb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080617/dd5bfd84/attachment.htm 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
       [not found]       ` <b0c88b10806160345i624cfc2ap78b32f00bf54a444@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-06-17 11:13         ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2008-06-17 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

If you can't find who is it - because I think there is no any special custodian
for disks, Wolfgang Denk is that person.

And please send your emails about U-BOOT directly to mailing list not personally
to me. If you want use to me for a support, we can sign a contract.

Michal


> Sorry Michael but I'm pretty new... how can I know who is it?
> I looked into MAINTAINERS and CREDITS but no disk/ directory found.
> 
> Regards,
> Antonio
> 
> 2008/6/16 Michal Simek <monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>>:
> 
> 
> 
>     > 2008/6/16 Michal Simek <monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>
>     <mailto:monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>>>:
>     >
>     >     Hi Antonio
>     >
>     >     I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch
>     contain
>     >     coding style
>     >     violation.
>     >
>     >     Regards,
>     >     Michal Simek
>     >
>     >     > Logic unit:
>     >     > Purpose:    Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
>     >     > Author:     Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com
>     <http://atmel.com>
>     >     <http://atmel.com>>
>     >     > Date  :     11 Jun 2008
>     >     >
>     >     > Status:
>     >     > ~~~~~~
>     >     > Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
>     >     > just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>     >     >
>     >     > I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
>     >     > as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT
>     partitions
>     >     > are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>     >     >
>     >     > Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com
>     <mailto:antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>     >     <mailto:antonio.costa at atmel.com <mailto:antonio.costa@atmel.com>>>
>     >     >
>     >     > diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
>     >     > index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
>     >     > --- a/disk/part_dos.c
>     >     > +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
>     >     > @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>     >     >  /*
>     >     > + * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
>     >     > + * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com
>     <http://atmel.com> <http://atmel.com>>
>     >     > + *                  <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com
>     <http://gmail.com>
>     >     <http://gmail.com>>
>     >
>     >     choose only one email
>     >
>     >
>     > Ok
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     >   * (C) Copyright 2001
>     >     >   * Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com <mailto:lo@routefree.com>
>     <mailto:lo at routefree.com <mailto:lo@routefree.com>>
>     >     >   * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de
>     <mailto:wd@denx.de>
>     >     <mailto:wd at denx.de <mailto:wd@denx.de>>.
>     >     > @@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned
>     char *le32)
>     >     >          );
>     >     >  }
>     >     >
>     >     > +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
>     >     > +{
>     >     > +    return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
>     >     > +}
>     >     > +
>     >
>     >     this should be in header file
>     >
>     >
>     > why? le32_to_int is defined in this file just above my function ???
>     >
>     OK, keep it.
> 
>     >
>     >     >  static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
>     >     >  {
>     >     >      return (part_type == 0x5 ||
>     >     > @@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
>     >     (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>     >     >       unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
>     >     >       dos_partition_t *pt;
>     >     >       int i;
>     >     > -
>     >     > +
>     >
>     >     Coding style issue.
>     >
>     >     What is this ? Some kind of white spaces instead tabs or what?
> 
>     In our initial patch, you had on this line tab - look at it.
> 
>     And send this patch with cc to person who is responsible for this
>     part of u-boot.
> 
>     Michal
> 
>     >     >       if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev,
>     ext_part_sector, 1,
>     >     (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
>     >     >               printf ("** Can't read partition table on
>     %d:%d **\n",
>     >     >                       dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
>     >     >               return -1;
>     >     >       }
>     >     > +
>     >     > +/*
>     >     > + * ARC:      This check is bad:
>     >     > + * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
>     >     > + * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
>     >     > + * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
>     >     > + * print_partition_extended
>     >     > +
>     >     >       if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
>     >     >               buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
>     >     >               printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
>     >     > @@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
>     >     (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>     >     >                       buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
>     >     >               return -1;
>     >     >       }
>     >     > -
>     >     > +*/
>     >     > +     i=test_block_type(buffer);
>     >     > +
>     >     > +     if(i==-1) {
>     >     > +             printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
>     >     > +                     buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
>     >     > +                     buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
>     >     > +             return -1;
>     >     > +     }
>     >     > +
>     >     > +     if(i==DOS_PBR)
>     >     > +             return -1;
>     >     > +
>     >     >       /* Print all primary/logical partitions */
>     >     >       pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
>     >     >       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
>     >     > @@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
>     >     (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>     >     >                       info->blksz = 512;
>     >     >                       info->start = ext_part_sector +
>     le32_to_int
>     >     (pt->start4);
>     >     >                       info->size  = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
>     >     > +
>     >     >                       switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
>     >     >                               case IF_TYPE_IDE:
>     >     >                               case IF_TYPE_SATA:
>     >     > @@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
>     >     (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
>     >     >                               case IF_TYPE_DOC:
>     >     >                                       sprintf ((char
>     *)info->name,
>     >     "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>     >     >                                       break;
>     >     > +                             case IF_TYPE_MMC:
>     >     > +                                     sprintf ((char
>     *)info->name,
>     >     "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>     >     > +                                     break;
>     >     > +                             case IF_TYPE_SD:
>     >     > +                             case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
>     >     > +                                     sprintf ((char
>     *)info->name,
>     >     "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>     >     > +                                     break;
>     >     >                               default:
>     >     >                                       sprintf ((char
>     *)info->name,
>     >     "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
>     >     >                                       break;
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     Regards,
>     >     Michal Simek
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1504 - Release Date: 15.6.2008 05:52

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
  2008-06-17  7:19     ` Antonio R. Costa
@ 2008-08-01 22:43       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
  2008-08-02 11:44         ` Antonio R. Costa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2008-08-01 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

 
>    Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in
>    fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
>    definition.
>    Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
> 
Any update about the re-submit patch?

Best Regards,
J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
  2008-08-01 22:43       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
@ 2008-08-02 11:44         ` Antonio R. Costa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-08-02 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi JC,
  I have been busy on writing a Linux driver for the DSP on our
AT572D940HF-EB board.
Furthermore in the next 3 weeks I'm on vacation, please gimme more time
cause
I would like rework this patch but also support for our board and SDHC
support for all
Atmel devices together with Haarvard.

Regards,
  Antonio R.


2008/8/2 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

>
> >    Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug
> in
> >    fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
> >    definition.
> >    Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
> >
> Any update about the re-submit patch?
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080802/bfa2d338/attachment.htm 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-02 11:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-11 13:00 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support Antonio R. Costa
2008-06-16  8:58 ` Michal Simek
2008-06-16 12:15   ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-06-17  7:19     ` Antonio R. Costa
2008-08-01 22:43       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-08-02 11:44         ` Antonio R. Costa
     [not found]   ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <48564107.8050700@seznam.cz>
     [not found]       ` <b0c88b10806160345i624cfc2ap78b32f00bf54a444@mail.gmail.com>
2008-06-17 11:13         ` Michal Simek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox