* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
@ 2008-06-11 13:00 Antonio R. Costa
2008-06-16 8:58 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-06-11 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Logic unit:
Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
Date : 11 Jun 2008
Status:
~~~~~~
Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
--- a/disk/part_dos.c
+++ b/disk/part_dos.c
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
+ * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
+ * <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com>
* (C) Copyright 2001
* Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com
* Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
@@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned char *le32)
);
}
+static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
+{
+ return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
+}
+
static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
{
return (part_type == 0x5 ||
@@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
dos_partition_t *pt;
int i;
-
+
if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector, 1, (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
printf ("** Can't read partition table on %d:%d **\n",
dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
return -1;
}
+
+/*
+ * ARC: This check is bad:
+ * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
+ * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
+ * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
+ * print_partition_extended
+
if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
@@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
return -1;
}
-
+*/
+ i=test_block_type(buffer);
+
+ if(i==-1) {
+ printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
+ buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
+ buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if(i==DOS_PBR)
+ return -1;
+
/* Print all primary/logical partitions */
pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
@@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
info->blksz = 512;
info->start = ext_part_sector + le32_to_int (pt->start4);
info->size = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
+
switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
case IF_TYPE_IDE:
case IF_TYPE_SATA:
@@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
case IF_TYPE_DOC:
sprintf ((char *)info->name, "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
break;
+ case IF_TYPE_MMC:
+ sprintf ((char *)info->name, "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
+ break;
+ case IF_TYPE_SD:
+ case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
+ sprintf ((char *)info->name, "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
+ break;
default:
sprintf ((char *)info->name, "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
break;
--
1.5.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
2008-06-11 13:00 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support Antonio R. Costa
@ 2008-06-16 8:58 ` Michal Simek
2008-06-16 12:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
[not found] ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2008-06-16 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Antonio
I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding style
violation.
Regards,
Michal Simek
> Logic unit:
> Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
> Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
> Date : 11 Jun 2008
>
> Status:
> ~~~~~~
> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>
> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>
> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
> /*
> + * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
> + * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
> + * <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com>
choose only one email
> * (C) Copyright 2001
> * Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com
> * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
> @@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned char *le32)
> );
> }
>
> +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
> +{
> + return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
> +}
> +
this should be in header file
> static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
> {
> return (part_type == 0x5 ||
> @@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
> dos_partition_t *pt;
> int i;
> -
> +
Coding style issue.
> if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector, 1, (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
> printf ("** Can't read partition table on %d:%d **\n",
> dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
> return -1;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * ARC: This check is bad:
> + * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
> + * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
> + * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
> + * print_partition_extended
> +
> if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
> buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
> printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> @@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
> return -1;
> }
> -
> +*/
> + i=test_block_type(buffer);
> +
> + if(i==-1) {
> + printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> + buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
> + buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if(i==DOS_PBR)
> + return -1;
> +
> /* Print all primary/logical partitions */
> pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
> @@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> info->blksz = 512;
> info->start = ext_part_sector + le32_to_int (pt->start4);
> info->size = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
> +
> switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
> case IF_TYPE_IDE:
> case IF_TYPE_SATA:
> @@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> case IF_TYPE_DOC:
> sprintf ((char *)info->name, "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> break;
> + case IF_TYPE_MMC:
> + sprintf ((char *)info->name, "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> + break;
> + case IF_TYPE_SD:
> + case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
> + sprintf ((char *)info->name, "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> + break;
> default:
> sprintf ((char *)info->name, "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> break;
>
>
Regards,
Michal Simek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
2008-06-16 8:58 ` Michal Simek
@ 2008-06-16 12:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-06-17 7:19 ` Antonio R. Costa
[not found] ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2008-06-16 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Antonio
>
> I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding style
> violation.
>
> Regards,
> Michal Simek
>
>> Logic unit:
>> Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
>> Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
>> Date : 11 Jun 2008
>>
>> Status:
>> ~~~~~~
>> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
>> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>>
>> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
>> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
>> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
>> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
>> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
>> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
[snip]
>> +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
>> +{
>> + return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
>> +}
>> +
>
> this should be in header file
Please use <asm/byteorder.h> rather than making Yet Another Define.
Note that the subdirectory asm gets symlinked to the appropriate
arch-specific subdirectory and then the right endian munching is
selected and it Just Works[tm].
PowerPC example:
<http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=include/asm-ppc/byteorder.h;h=3f5bcf63a1f980eb0c5e95e458119f55f5855274;hb=HEAD>
[snip]
> Regards,
> Michal Simek
Thanks,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
2008-06-16 12:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2008-06-17 7:19 ` Antonio R. Costa
2008-08-01 22:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-06-17 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
2008/6/16 Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>:
> Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> Hi Antonio
>>
>> I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding
>> style
>> violation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michal Simek
>>
>> Logic unit:
>>> Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
>>> Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
>>> Date : 11 Jun 2008
>>>
>>> Status:
>>> ~~~~~~
>>> Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
>>> just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
>>>
>>> I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
>>> as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
>>> are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
>>> index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
>>> --- a/disk/part_dos.c
>>> +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
>>>
>>
> [snip]
>
> +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
>>> +{
>>> + return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>>
>> this should be in header file
>>
>
> Please use <asm/byteorder.h> rather than making Yet Another Define. Note
> that the subdirectory asm gets symlinked to the appropriate arch-specific
> subdirectory and then the right endian munching is selected and it Just
> Works[tm].
>
> PowerPC example:
> <
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=include/asm-ppc/byteorder.h;h=3f5bcf63a1f980eb0c5e95e458119f55f5855274;hb=HEAD
> >
>
Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in fact
at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
definition.
Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
In these cases is there a special manner to format the subject to make an
explicit reference to a patched patch :) ?
Regards,
Antonio
>
> [snip]
>
> Regards,
>> Michal Simek
>>
>
> Thanks,
> gvb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080617/dd5bfd84/attachment.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
[not found] ` <b0c88b10806160345i624cfc2ap78b32f00bf54a444@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-06-17 11:13 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2008-06-17 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
If you can't find who is it - because I think there is no any special custodian
for disks, Wolfgang Denk is that person.
And please send your emails about U-BOOT directly to mailing list not personally
to me. If you want use to me for a support, we can sign a contract.
Michal
> Sorry Michael but I'm pretty new... how can I know who is it?
> I looked into MAINTAINERS and CREDITS but no disk/ directory found.
>
> Regards,
> Antonio
>
> 2008/6/16 Michal Simek <monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>>:
>
>
>
> > 2008/6/16 Michal Simek <monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>
> <mailto:monstr at seznam.cz <mailto:monstr@seznam.cz>>>:
> >
> > Hi Antonio
> >
> > I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch
> contain
> > coding style
> > violation.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michal Simek
> >
> > > Logic unit:
> > > Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
> > > Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com
> <http://atmel.com>
> > <http://atmel.com>>
> > > Date : 11 Jun 2008
> > >
> > > Status:
> > > ~~~~~~
> > > Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
> > > just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
> > >
> > > I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
> > > as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT
> partitions
> > > are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com
> <mailto:antonio.costa@atmel.com>
> > <mailto:antonio.costa at atmel.com <mailto:antonio.costa@atmel.com>>>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
> > > index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
> > > --- a/disk/part_dos.c
> > > +++ b/disk/part_dos.c
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
> > > /*
> > > + * (C) Copyright 2008 Atmel Corp.
> > > + * Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com
> <http://atmel.com> <http://atmel.com>>
> > > + * <costa.antonior <at> gmail.com
> <http://gmail.com>
> > <http://gmail.com>>
> >
> > choose only one email
> >
> >
> > Ok
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > * (C) Copyright 2001
> > > * Raymond Lo, lo at routefree.com <mailto:lo@routefree.com>
> <mailto:lo at routefree.com <mailto:lo@routefree.com>>
> > > * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de
> <mailto:wd@denx.de>
> > <mailto:wd at denx.de <mailto:wd@denx.de>>.
> > > @@ -53,6 +56,11 @@ static inline int le32_to_int(unsigned
> char *le32)
> > > );
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
> > > +{
> > > + return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > this should be in header file
> >
> >
> > why? le32_to_int is defined in this file just above my function ???
> >
> OK, keep it.
>
> >
> > > static inline int is_extended(int part_type)
> > > {
> > > return (part_type == 0x5 ||
> > > @@ -166,12 +174,20 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
> > (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> > > unsigned char buffer[DEFAULT_SECTOR_SIZE];
> > > dos_partition_t *pt;
> > > int i;
> > > -
> > > +
> >
> > Coding style issue.
> >
> > What is this ? Some kind of white spaces instead tabs or what?
>
> In our initial patch, you had on this line tab - look at it.
>
> And send this patch with cc to person who is responsible for this
> part of u-boot.
>
> Michal
>
> > > if (dev_desc->block_read (dev_desc->dev,
> ext_part_sector, 1,
> > (ulong *) buffer) != 1) {
> > > printf ("** Can't read partition table on
> %d:%d **\n",
> > > dev_desc->dev, ext_part_sector);
> > > return -1;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * ARC: This check is bad:
> > > + * unfortunately both MBR and FAT bootsector
> > > + * have a sign 0x55aa @ 0x1FF
> > > + * I replaced it by test_block_type as in
> > > + * print_partition_extended
> > > +
> > > if (buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET] != 0x55 ||
> > > buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1] != 0xaa) {
> > > printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> > > @@ -179,7 +195,19 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
> > (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> > > buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
> > > return -1;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > +*/
> > > + i=test_block_type(buffer);
> > > +
> > > + if(i==-1) {
> > > + printf ("bad MBR sector signature 0x%02x%02x\n",
> > > + buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET],
> > > + buffer[DOS_PART_MAGIC_OFFSET + 1]);
> > > + return -1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if(i==DOS_PBR)
> > > + return -1;
> > > +
> > > /* Print all primary/logical partitions */
> > > pt = (dos_partition_t *) (buffer + DOS_PART_TBL_OFFSET);
> > > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, pt++) {
> > > @@ -193,6 +221,7 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
> > (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> > > info->blksz = 512;
> > > info->start = ext_part_sector +
> le32_to_int
> > (pt->start4);
> > > info->size = le32_to_int (pt->size4);
> > > +
> > > switch(dev_desc->if_type) {
> > > case IF_TYPE_IDE:
> > > case IF_TYPE_SATA:
> > > @@ -208,6 +237,13 @@ static int get_partition_info_extended
> > (block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, int ext_part
> > > case IF_TYPE_DOC:
> > > sprintf ((char
> *)info->name,
> > "docd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> > > break;
> > > + case IF_TYPE_MMC:
> > > + sprintf ((char
> *)info->name,
> > "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> > > + break;
> > > + case IF_TYPE_SD:
> > > + case IF_TYPE_SDHC:
> > > + sprintf ((char
> *)info->name,
> > "sd%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > sprintf ((char
> *)info->name,
> > "xx%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> > > break;
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michal Simek
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1504 - Release Date: 15.6.2008 05:52
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
2008-06-17 7:19 ` Antonio R. Costa
@ 2008-08-01 22:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-08-02 11:44 ` Antonio R. Costa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2008-08-01 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
> Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in
> fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
> definition.
> Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
>
Any update about the re-submit patch?
Best Regards,
J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support
2008-08-01 22:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
@ 2008-08-02 11:44 ` Antonio R. Costa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio R. Costa @ 2008-08-02 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi JC,
I have been busy on writing a Linux driver for the DSP on our
AT572D940HF-EB board.
Furthermore in the next 3 weeks I'm on vacation, please gimme more time
cause
I would like rework this patch but also support for our board and SDHC
support for all
Atmel devices together with Haarvard.
Regards,
Antonio R.
2008/8/2 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
>
> > Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug
> in
> > fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
> > definition.
> > Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
> >
> Any update about the re-submit patch?
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080802/bfa2d338/attachment.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-02 11:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-11 13:00 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] FAT Bare Partition Support Antonio R. Costa
2008-06-16 8:58 ` Michal Simek
2008-06-16 12:15 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-06-17 7:19 ` Antonio R. Costa
2008-08-01 22:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-08-02 11:44 ` Antonio R. Costa
[not found] ` <b0c88b10806160308x1b5e3e26g9ebb1fc52e2f7f67@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <48564107.8050700@seznam.cz>
[not found] ` <b0c88b10806160345i624cfc2ap78b32f00bf54a444@mail.gmail.com>
2008-06-17 11:13 ` Michal Simek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox