From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:10:52 +0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mtd: CONFIG_NAND_LAZY_SCAN support (2nd rev)
In-Reply-To: <4863C94A.2010602@freescale.com>
References: <4863664A.4020807@emcraft.com> <4863C94A.2010602@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <4868E96C.6000809@emcraft.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Scott Wood wrote:
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
>> index 37eb41b..6f5d13d 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_nand.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
>> char *argv[])
>>      }
>>      nand = &nand_info[nand_curr_device];
>>
>> +    nand_lazy_scan_finish(nand);
>> +
>
> There are other entry points that need to be covered (e.g.
> do_nandboot, do_onenand, env_nand, jffs2, etc).  Probably better to
> put the call in nand_block_isbad().

You're right. I've added scanning in nand_block_checkbad.

> Is there any reason not to enable this unconditionally?

Don't really know. I've used config option just to provide old behavior.

--
Ilya