[U-Boot-Users] V2: Error in recent check-in

[U-Boot-Users] V2: Error in recent check-in

[Chris Zankel]

Hi Sascha,

You misspelled 'CONFIG' in your last check-in: 
7c37b54184893d4fe4e23933e6a8deae1c9d62a2. This effectively disabled 
/dev/env0 (wonder if you tried it ;-)

Cheers!
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diff
Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080707/5822da69/attachment.txt 

[U-Boot-Users] V2: Error in recent check-in

[Sascha Hauer]

Hi Chris,

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:47:33PM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> You misspelled 'CONFIG' in your last check-in:  
> 7c37b54184893d4fe4e23933e6a8deae1c9d62a2. This effectively disabled  
> /dev/env0 (wonder if you tried it ;-)

Not at runtime. Applied, thanks.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K. - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kontakt-Informationen finden Sie im Header dieser Mail oder
auf der Webseite -> http://www.pengutronix.de/impressum/ <-

[U-Boot-Users] V2 status, (Was Re: V2: Error in recent check-in)

[Chris Zankel]

Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Please sign-off on your patch.. :) 
Sure. It wasn't really a patch, though...

> glad to see another u-boot v2 interest folk :)

I really like the structure of V2 but my fear is that there's not enough 
man power behind it. We are using Phytec's i.MX27 board, so we are 
'stuck' with that version.

I'm sorry if this questions has been asked before, but do you see more 
momentum to push for V2? It's probably too early to ask for a separate 
V2 mailing list?

> folks on the list have been bashing my head with it ;)... happy hacking...

Thanks. I'd like to help but unfortunately, I'm just too busy to help 
out at this point. :-(

Cheers!
-Chris

[U-Boot-Users] V2 status, (Was Re: V2: Error in recent check-in)

[Robert Schwebel]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:36:13AM -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> I really like the structure of V2 but my fear is that there's not
> enough man power behind it.

It depends on how far people's interest will go in the future. It turned
out to be relatively easy to port things over to a solid design once a
feature is really needed by somebody.

> We are using Phytec's i.MX27 board, so we are 'stuck' with that
> version.

Consider it a feature, you can help lowering the (ifdef) entropy in the
universe :-) Which functionality are you missing?

> I'm sorry if this questions has been asked before, but do you see more
> momentum to push for V2?

It depends on community and customer interest.

> It's probably too early to ask for a separate V2 mailing list?

Yes; at the moment it's probably better to leave the traffic here. It
still can be split up once it goes up significantly.

rsc
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9