From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <shimoda.yoshihiro@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:40:44 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] usb: add support for R8A66597 usb
	controller
In-Reply-To: <20080710110101.48FA0248FE@gemini.denx.de>
References: <20080710110101.48FA0248FE@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4876034C.7040507@renesas.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

2008/07/10 20:01, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <4875E69B.10505@renesas.com> you wrote:
>>> is it not possible to have a better name for the struct and the var
>>> and btw for the function naming?
>> Because XTAL, LDRV, DEVADD are a register name or register bit name,
>> I think that it is a good name...
>> But I will change a name of the "struct r8a66957 gr8a66597" to
>> "struct r8a66597 r8a66597_dev".
> 
> Can you not find some simpler name that "r8a66597"? That's a mess to
> type and to read.

Thank you for your comment.

I can change that "struct r8a66597" for a simple name. For example,
its name is "struct r597". However, I do not want to change a source
file name and CONFIG_ name, because "R8A66597" is product name.

Best Regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda