From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:45:05 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Changing u-boot relocation scheme
In-Reply-To: <f608b67d0807232345r482792b6lbc9bd6804f48e597@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f608b67d0807231546t44ef5a6ak68d98b26beb5d8fc@mail.gmail.com>	<20080724031826.ECD9B248B9@gemini.denx.de>
	<f608b67d0807232345r482792b6lbc9bd6804f48e597@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <48888761.3040206@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

vb wrote:

>> What Grant suggests is the way to go. I do not think your approach has
>> chances for mainline.
>>
> 
> I am sorry to hear this, especially since what I suggest would be
> completely compiler agnostic and would allow to avoid some of the
> limitations one must follow today while adding stuff to u-boot.
> 
> cheers,
> /vb

As an alternate approach, perhaps this is something
that might be explored in the framework of the so-called
"U-Boot V2" effort?  Specifically, if you can demonstrate
it working, that would hold much more weight.  You know,
"Show me the code."! :-)

jdl