From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:30:21 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config
In-Reply-To: <0F5F41EF-E2A9-44D5-B8AF-4E27F2C05796@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <A8499417-7011-4DFA-B453-B6C05EC6AEAB@kernel.crashing.org>	<488E0C4D.4000707@grandegger.com>
	<0F5F41EF-E2A9-44D5-B8AF-4E27F2C05796@kernel.crashing.org>
Message-ID: <488F297D.6040405@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Our main interest in using FDT for U-Boot is to make it dynamically  
>> configurable having just one image for various variants of the  
>> hardware. Replacing config.h completely seems overkill to me (and  
>> will not even be possible).
> 
> Agreed.  I'm not suggesting replacing config.h, but removing bits and  
> pieces of it.
> 
> - k

I think we should first spend more serious effort towards
installing Konfig structure and building into the config mix.

jdl