From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:36:19 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config In-Reply-To: <20080804153141.3B4AC24848@gemini.denx.de> References: <20080804153141.3B4AC24848@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <489721F3.10100@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <48971322.7000305@freescale.com> you wrote: >>> Why? One address is as good as any other. >> I think statistically you'll find that that isn't true. A built-in DTB is more >> likely to be present on the flash than an external DTB would be. > > Please present the data your statistics is based on. Give me a break, Wolfgang. I don't have any data, but what I'm saying makes sense. A system is more likely to have one binary blob present than two bloba. That has to be obvious. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale