From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Gehrlein <sew_s@tqs.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:03:30 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/7 v6] ARM: Add arm1176 core with
 S3C6400 SoC
In-Reply-To: <20080807101725.83A2424885@gemini.denx.de>
References: <20080807101725.83A2424885@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <489AD682.2050104@tqs.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> In message <489AC866.7070401@tqs.de> you wrote:
>>> That's what we've been doing so far:
>>>
>>> 	-> ls -l include/s3c*
>>> 	-rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 21763 Dec  9  2007 include/s3c2400.h
>>> 	-rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd  7629 Dec  9  2007 include/s3c2410.h
>>> 	-rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 38129 Oct 13  2007 include/s3c24x0.h
>> Sorry, don't understand. So is it okay, that these files reside in the 
>> include directory or not?
> 
> Unless you want to submit a clenaup patch for many existing
> processors, yes.
> 
> What is your suggestion instead?

It was just a question to read your opinion. Personally, I can live with 
it. I thought, CPU specific header files had to go to the 
include/asm-<arch>/arch-<cpu> directory.

Sorry for the noise.

Kind regards,
Jens