From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:53:54 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Allow console input to be
	disabled
In-Reply-To: <20080811143122.6a4c6919@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
References: <48905BE7.1060402@mimc.co.uk>	<20080807122701.202ee982@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>	<m2myjp10ht.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>	<489AEDF7.9000400@ge.com>	<20080809231636.2EB1E24885@gemini.denx.de>	<20080811092533.3407704c@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>	<20080811082818.81187248BF@gemini.denx.de>	<20080811131944.500ef1e9@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>	<20080811121915.A2DE8248BF@gemini.denx.de>
	<20080811143122.6a4c6919@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
Message-ID: <48A03662.6020400@mimc.co.uk>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
>>> So how about introducing a new flag, e.g. GD_FLG_DISABLE_CONSOLE, and
>>> use that instead? If set, it will disable both input and output, while
>>> GD_FLG_SILENT will just disable console output.  
>> Sounds much better to me.
> 
> Ok, great. Mark, does this sound good to you?

Sounds fine.  I didn't mean to cause this much of a "debate" !!

I'll rework in the new flag, and report back.

Thanks
Mark