From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Read pipeline depth set to 4 for PPC440SP/SPE, PPC405EX, PPC460EX/GT/SX processors
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:44:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A32B7F.20106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813183108.9B4F3248AC@gemini.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080813171332.GC24225@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>>> But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used for
>>> vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please read the
>>> Coding Style requirements.
>> Where? I see no mention of alignment in the coding style documentation.
>
> See http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CodingStyle, bullet 4.2:
>
> Use TAB characters for indentation and vertical alignment, not
> spaces
OK, I was looking at the Coding Standards section of the README.
>> I know it's common practice, but could someone please explain *why* TABs
>> are mandated for alignment? It makes sense for indentation, as it allows
>> adjusting the tab size[1], requires fewer keystrokes to change
>> indentation level, and conveys meaning with respect to the structure of
>> the code.
>
> The very same reasons apply for vertical alignment.
They do not. It specifically *disallows* changing the tab size, and has
no correlation to code structure.
>> The only thing that using TABs for vertical alignment gets you is some
>> slight compression of the source code when not compressed by other means,
>> an annoying 1/8 chance of the column shifting by 8 characters when the
>> code to the left is changed, the removal of flexibility with respect to
>
> That's 8 times better than the 100% chance that it will shift when
> using spaces for alignment.
I disagree. It's much easier to edit when I know how many spaces I'll
have to add/remove beforehand.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 4:43 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Read pipeline depth set to 4 for PPC440SP/SPE, PPC405EX, PPC460EX/GT/SX processors fkan at amcc.com
2008-08-13 5:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-13 6:26 ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-13 6:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-13 13:59 ` Prodyut Hazarika
2008-08-13 14:24 ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-13 17:13 ` Scott Wood
2008-08-13 18:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-13 18:44 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-08-13 19:04 ` prodyut hazarika
2008-08-13 19:16 ` Prodyut Hazarika
2008-08-13 20:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-13 20:19 ` Prodyut Hazarika
2008-08-13 20:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-13 20:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-13 18:10 fkan at amcc.com
2008-08-13 20:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A32B7F.20106@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox