From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:40:52 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sh: rsk7203: Add support pkt_data_pull and pkt_data_push function Message-ID: <48B62C54.20103@renesas.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Add function of smc911x, pkt_data_pull and pkt_data_push. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- board/rsk7203/rsk7203.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/rsk7203/rsk7203.c b/board/rsk7203/rsk7203.c index beb943e..99cc10a 100644 --- a/board/rsk7203/rsk7203.c +++ b/board/rsk7203/rsk7203.c @@ -48,3 +48,23 @@ int dram_init(void) void led_set_state(unsigned short value) { } + +/* + * The RSK board has the SMSC9118 wired up 'incorrectly'. + * Byte-swapping is necessary, and so poor performance is inevitable. + * This problem cannot evade by the swap function of CHIP, this can + * evade by software Byte-swapping. + * And this has problem by FIFO access only. pkt_data_pull/pkt_data_push + * functions necessary to solve this problem. + */ +u32 pkt_data_pull(u32 addr) +{ + volatile u16 *addr_16 = (u16 *)addr; + return (((swab16(*addr_16) << 16) & 0xFFFF0000)|swab16(*(addr_16 + 1))); +} + +void pkt_data_push(u32 addr, u32 val) +{ + *(volatile u16 *)(addr + 2) = swab16((u16)val); + *(volatile u16 *)(addr) = swab16((u16)(val >> 16)); +} -- 1.5.6.3