From: richardretanubun <richardretanubun@ruggedcom.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-boot] [PATCH 2/2] NET: QE: UEC: Allow uec re-initialization based on netretry environment variable.
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:10:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48CFB02F.9020703@ruggedcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BF7972.3020905@gmail.com>
Hi Ben,
Ben Warren wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> richardretanubun wrote:
>
>> Allow uec_init to run more than once, based on the netretry environment
>> variable.
>>
>> This allows for manual (back and forth) switching between network
>> interfaces.
>>
>>
>>
> My general issue with this patch is that if this functionality is really
> useful, it should be in the main device control flow (net/eth.c), not in
> a single driver.
>
Understood, I am still new with u-boot and not that familiar with network device drivers. I will look into this file
and resubmit something when I think I have something that can apply to all devices.
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun <RichardRetanubun_at_ruggedcom.com>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/qe/uec.c b/drivers/qe/uec.c
>>
>> index 344c649..88402ca 100644
>>
>> --- a/drivers/qe/uec.c
>>
>> +++ b/drivers/qe/uec.c
>>
>> @@ -1192,9 +1192,17 @@ static int uec_init(struct eth_device* dev, bd_t *bd)
>>
>> uec_private_t *uec;
>>
>> int err, i;
>>
>> struct phy_info *curphy;
>>
>> + char *netretry = NULL;
>>
>>
>>
>> uec = (uec_private_t *)dev->priv;
>>
>>
>>
>> +
>>
>> + /* Allow for net re-initialization based on netretry environment
>> setting */
>>
>> + netretry = getenv("netretry");
>>
>> + if (netretry != NULL && (strcmp(netretry, "yes") == 0)) {
>>
>> + uec->the_first_run = 0;
>>
>> + }
>>
>> +
>>
>>
> I'm sure you know that "netretry" already exists, and has a different
> meaning. It's not a good idea for an environment variable to do
> different things depending on context.
>
I do, I thought the purpose was to retry a network operation that failed. Since a network operation can
fail because of many causes, I choose to 'broaden' the scope to include bad PHY configurations.
If I have to choose a different environment variable name to control this what would be a good one? (miiretry)
>> if (uec->the_first_run == 0) {
>>
>> err = init_phy(dev);
>>
>> if (err) {
>>
>> @@ -1223,12 +1231,16 @@ static int uec_init(struct eth_device* dev, bd_t
>> *bd)
>>
>> if (err || i <= 0)
>>
>> printf("warning: %s: timeout on PHY link\n", dev->name);
>>
>>
>>
>> - uec->the_first_run = 1;
>>
>> + /* If netretry is not set, or not set to yes, assume no retry */
>>
>> + netretry = getenv("netretry");
>>
>> + if (netretry == NULL || (strcmp(netretry, "yes") != 0)) {
>>
>> + uec->the_first_run = 1;
>>
>> + }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> /* Set up the MAC address */
>>
>> if (dev->enetaddr[0] & 0x01) {
>>
>> - printf("%s: MacAddress is multcast address\n",
>>
>> + printf("%s: MacAddress is multicast address\n",
>>
>> __FUNCTION__);
>>
>>
> OK, good catch.
>
>
> Sorry again for taking so long to respond properly.
>
Don't worry, as you can see I am just as capable of responding (even) later :)
Thank you for the advice.
I will study the way making a more "generic" form of this patch.
I'm afraid It won't happen soon though, the hardware I'm supposed to be booting is arriving soon.
I will submit an updated patch when I got something working on this.
>
> regards,
>
> Ben
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-16 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-18 19:52 [U-Boot] [U-boot] [PATCH 2/2] NET: QE: UEC: Allow uec re-initialization based on netretry environment variable richardretanubun
2008-08-18 21:17 ` Ben Warren
2008-08-18 23:03 ` richardretanubun
2008-09-04 6:00 ` Ben Warren
2008-09-16 13:10 ` richardretanubun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48CFB02F.9020703@ruggedcom.com \
--to=richardretanubun@ruggedcom.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox