From: Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Malformed ARP packets
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:54:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D3065D.60700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e0b9cb00809180249y531d3d05r19394ce0cbf6b372@mail.gmail.com>
Remi Lefevre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ported U-Boot on my custom MPC8270 board.
> Everything seems to go well but my ARP packets are malformed:
[snip]
> [60 bytes on wire] <- correct
> correct broadcast correct mac addr ARP type
> ----------------- ------------------ -----------
> 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff da b0 4e 0f 0a 26 08 06 00 01 | <- correct
> 00000010 4e 0f 0a 26 08 06 00 01 4e 0f 0a 26 08 06 00 01 | <- malformed
> 00000020 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 a8 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 | <- correct
> 00000030 c0 a8 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 | <- malformed
> 0000003c
>
> The source mac address seems incorrectly and partially duplicated at
> byte 16. Data is not random, but duplicated or mispositioned.
>
> I saw the following thread:
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-January/028159.html
>
> So I checked and double-checked my SDRAM configuration but cannot
> find anything wrong. I also get the same results in BBI or PBI.
Is this DIMM memory sticks with using SPD configuration or are the SDRAM
chips soldered to the board?
This really smells of misconfigured SDRAM where your SDRAM *timing* is
wrong. It really looks like your DMA engine is latching the "next" bus
cycle while your SDRAM is still presenting the previous data. IOW, your
memory is slower than your SDRAM controller is configured for.
Did you verify the SDRAM databook timing vs. what you configured your
SDRAM controller to do? Did the hardware engineer that made the board
verify your configuration? Did he give you a good configuration? If
so, are you sure it is good??? (never trust the hardware weenies ;-)
Did you read and understand <http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/SDRAM> ?
If you are sure of the timing, I would suggest you write a simple test
application that DMAs from flash to RAM and verifies it, DMAs from RAM
to RAM and verifies it, if possible do two simultaneous DMAs from A->B
and C->D so that you are exercising the SDRAM pipelining vigorously.
> MII monitoring works correctly:
> => mii dump
This is meaningless for the problem at hand. The problem is the DMA
from SDRAM into the ethernet MAC is messed up. You are messed up before
the PHY gets in the picture.
[snip]
> Anything I could have forgotten to check ?
>
> Best regards,
> R?mi Lefevre
In real estate the three most important things are "location, location,
location." In engineering, they are "timing, timing, timing."
HTH,
gvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 9:49 [U-Boot] Malformed ARP packets Remi Lefevre
2008-09-19 1:54 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2008-09-19 9:37 ` Remi Lefevre
2008-09-19 11:57 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-09-19 12:51 ` Remi Lefevre
2008-09-19 13:05 ` Jerry Van Baren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D3065D.60700@gmail.com \
--to=gvb.uboot@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox