From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:55:25 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pci: Treat all PCI bus addresses as 64-bit
In-Reply-To: <20081021144616.A82A7835694E@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1224598531-2698-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20081021144616.A82A7835694E@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <48FDED5D.3010403@ge.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
> 
> In message <1224598531-2698-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>> PCI bus is inherently 64-bit.  We should treat all PCI related bus
>> addresses as 64-bit quanities.  This allows us to have the ability
>> to support devices or memory on the PCI bus above the 32-bit boundary.
> 
> I don't think this is a good idea. There are pure 32 bit systems  out
> there which will never use more than 32 bit for the PCI resources, so
> why load them with the additional memory size and execution time?
> 
> Should we not enable this only for such systems that actually need it?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

Why would we not use phys_addr_t and phys_size_t for the PCI addresses?

Best regards,
gvb