From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Hejnfelt <mh@newtec.dk>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:07:52 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] Building u-boot for the AT91RM9200-EK circa 2008
In-Reply-To: <20081103111117.231A083568B6@gemini.denx.de>
References: <579033.94714.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<490EA7C0.5050908@newtec.dk>
	<20081103111117.231A083568B6@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <490EE998.5020906@newtec.dk>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Martin Hejnfelt,
>
> In message <490EA7C0.5050908@newtec.dk> you wrote:
>   
> ...
>   
>> 642D up and running, but the problem relies in the board specific 
>> flash.c file for the DK board. The difference is the ID that the two 
>>     
>
> Why do you have to use this at all? Isn't the flash CFI conformant so
> the generic CFI flash driver would work?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>   
I must say, I'm still really new to U-boot so I'm not sure if I my 
answer is the best method. The flash circuit is CFI compatible, but 
since I used the already made AT91RM9200 files and modified these, I 
found the problem easily and solved it this way. I will probably hit 
myself in the head in some months when my skills have improved :)

Mvh. / Best Regards

Martin Hejnfelt