* [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt?
@ 2008-12-10 23:00 Richard Retanubun
2008-12-11 0:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Retanubun @ 2008-12-10 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
I am using u-boot version 2008.10 + git commit 13d36ec849785453953d00220b2c7dc66644a3c2
The board is a custom MPC8360E, similar to MPC8360EMDS from freescale.
My DDR-SDRAM is at address 0x0 - 0x1FFFFFFF
I am trying to limit the amount of memory needed to load and boot a linux kernel (2.6.26)
to do this I loaded my fdt at address 0x20_0000 and uImage at 0x_30_0000
When I run bootm, I both the kernel and fdt passed their checksum tests, and then I got this error.
ERROR: image is not a fdt - must RESET the board to recover.
However, if I loaded my fdt at address 0x40_0000 and uImage at 0x50_0000, bootm works fine.
Is there a reason why fdt must be loaded at a specific offset from the start of RAM?
Thank you for all your time
- Richard Retanubun.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt?
2008-12-10 23:00 [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt? Richard Retanubun
@ 2008-12-11 0:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-11 12:04 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-12-11 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Richard Retanubun,
In message <49404A1C.1070801@RuggedCom.com> you wrote:
>
> I am trying to limit the amount of memory needed to load and boot a linux kernel (2.6.26)
> to do this I loaded my fdt at address 0x20_0000 and uImage at 0x_30_0000
>
> When I run bootm, I both the kernel and fdt passed their checksum tests, and then I got this error.
> ERROR: image is not a fdt - must RESET the board to recover.
...so the uncompressed Linux kernel image was written on top of your
FDT image, corrupting it.
> However, if I loaded my fdt at address 0x40_0000 and uImage at 0x50_0000, bootm works fine.
Makes sense.
> Is there a reason why fdt must be loaded at a specific offset from the start of RAM?
Yes, there is - you need free space to load the uncompressed Linux
kernel to low memory.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Dealing with failure is easy: work hard to improve. Success is also
easy to handle: you've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to
improve.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt?
2008-12-11 0:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2008-12-11 12:04 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-12-11 14:36 ` Richard Retanubun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2008-12-11 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Richard Retanubun,
>
> In message <49404A1C.1070801@RuggedCom.com> you wrote:
>> I am trying to limit the amount of memory needed to load and boot a linux kernel (2.6.26)
>> to do this I loaded my fdt at address 0x20_0000 and uImage at 0x_30_0000
FWIIW, your FDT blob should be a whole lot less than 1MB, like 4K-16K.
I've taken to loading it 0x8000 (32K) before my linux image.
[snip Wolfgang's diagnosis of the overwrite problem]
Best regards,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt?
2008-12-11 12:04 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2008-12-11 14:36 ` Richard Retanubun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Retanubun @ 2008-12-11 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Richard Retanubun,
>>
>> In message <49404A1C.1070801@RuggedCom.com> you wrote:
>>> I am trying to limit the amount of memory needed to load and boot a linux kernel (2.6.26)
>>> to do this I loaded my fdt at address 0x20_0000 and uImage at 0x_30_0000
>
> FWIIW, your FDT blob should be a whole lot less than 1MB, like 4K-16K.
> I've taken to loading it 0x8000 (32K) before my linux image.
>
> [snip Wolfgang's diagnosis of the overwrite problem]
Dear Wolfgang and Jerry,
D'oh! I forgot that my uImage is compressed. Thank you for the prompt diagnosis.
My FDT blob is a whole lot less than 1MB, thanks for the 32K recommendation.
- Richard Retanubun.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-11 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-10 23:00 [U-Boot] bootm command: is there any load address limitation for fdt? Richard Retanubun
2008-12-11 0:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-12-11 12:04 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-12-11 14:36 ` Richard Retanubun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox