From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:28:36 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] make make quiet In-Reply-To: <20081230221406.D7BEC8225019@gemini.denx.de> References: <1230636057.17914.5.camel@duo> <20081230221406.D7BEC8225019@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <495AA094.7030708@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear kenneth johansson, > > In message <1230636057.17914.5.camel@duo> you wrote: >> Only print out the target name during make. >> For old style set V=1 > > What is the rationale for this patch? I can see no real advantage with > it. > > If you find the make output annoying, you can silence make by passing > the "-s" flag. FWIW, I like the Linux-style non-verbose but not completely silent output. It shows what is being built without too much noise. It's useful for sanity checking that edits got saved, dependencies are working, etc. > But most of all, your patch costs a lot of additional processes. > Running "make all" for above configuration takes 2150 processes > without your patch, and 2410 with it. And this does not even count > the additional calls to shell builtins. Unix scripting is inefficient, news at 11. What's the actual time difference? -Scott