From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Enable multi chip support in the NAND layer
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:36:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49758D1C.30802@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901200840.04367.sr@denx.de>
Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Monday 19 January 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Are they accessed as 2 NAND controllers, or 2 chips on one controller?
>>> 2 chips on one controller.
>>>
>>>> We can make it "#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS 2" if that's appropriate, but
>>>> defining it to CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE doesn't seem to make sense.
>>> OK with me.
>> NAND_MAX_CHIPS should be set to 1!
>>
>> NAND_MAX_CHIPS defines the number of NAND chips (or dies) *per* NAND
>> device (or bank) meaning two or more identical NAND chips can be mapped
>> to one device. So far this was not supported, because nand_scan() was
>> always called with maxchips=1 in nand_init_chip:
>>
>> $ cat drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c:
>> ...
>> static void nand_init_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *nand,
>> ulong base_addr)
>> {
>> mtd->priv = nand;
>>
>> nand->IO_ADDR_R = nand->IO_ADDR_W = (void __iomem *)base_addr;
>> if (board_nand_init(nand) == 0) {
>> if (nand_scan(mtd, 1) == 0) {
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> if (!mtd->name)
>> mtd->name = (char *)default_nand_name;
>> } else
>> mtd->name = NULL;
>> } else {
>> mtd->name = NULL;
>> mtd->size = 0;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Furthermore, the callback chip->select_chip() must be provided by the
>> NAND driver to select the chips properly. It's seems not to be
>> implemented for NDFC and therefore you do not have this choice.
>> Therefore NAND_MAX_CHIPS should be set to 1 for the Bamboo.
>
> The 4xx NDFC driver uses the board_nand_select_device() function to select the
> NAND chip (other platforms do it this way as well). IIRC, this function was
> already introduced with old legacy NAND driver. Could be that it is
> deprecated now and should be replaced with the ->select_device() function.
NAND device selection is a different issue. The NAND FLASHes are
presented to the user as separate devices. I don't think it's
deprecated, it's just an option, the only one so far.
Wolfgang.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 18:53 [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Enable multi chip support in the NAND layer Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-15 22:17 ` Scott Wood
2009-01-16 7:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-16 8:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-16 17:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-19 16:12 ` Stefan Roese
2009-01-19 17:08 ` Scott Wood
2009-01-19 17:21 ` Stefan Roese
2009-01-19 19:50 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-20 7:40 ` Stefan Roese
2009-01-20 8:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49758D1C.30802@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox