public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] IP_t should be a "packed" struct
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:21:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4980CC59.1070302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b73e93990901281240l71c60e96y837802e434e5a681@mail.gmail.com>

Luigi Mantellini wrote:
> Dear All
>
> From my point of view, when packing is formally required (ie packets
> headers), the structs should be declared explicitly as __packed__. The
> correctness of the object code should be independent from the compiler
> optimizations and we should always remember that the offset of a
> struct field is not necessarily the sum of the sizes of the fields
> that precede it.
>
> struct {
>  type1 a;
>  type2 b;
>  type3 c;
> } mystruct
>
>
> offset(mystruct.c)  !=  sizeof(type1) + sizeof(type2).
>
> Regarding the CFLAGS used by me... I haven't set any CFLAGS and I just
> do a make qemu_mips_config CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux- && make
> CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux... and a boundary alignment is not an alien
> choice for a good compiler (a standard gcc4.2.4 in my case).
> Furthermore I expect a correct object always... with any -Ox flag (a
> apart bugs... of course).
>
> My idea should be to declare a define like this
>
> #define PKT_HEADER __attribute__((__packed__))
>
> my 2EuroCents.
>
> best regards,
>
> luigi
>
>   
OK, sounds good.  Send a patch please.

regards,
Ben
<snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-28 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-27 18:32 [U-Boot] IP_t should be a "packed" struct Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2009-01-28  9:42 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2009-01-28 17:55 ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 18:36   ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-01-28 18:58     ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 20:40       ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 21:21         ` Ben Warren [this message]
2009-01-28 21:38           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 21:52             ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 22:21               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 22:16             ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 22:27               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 23:04                 ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-29 10:20                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-29 10:37                     ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-01-28 20:58   ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 21:26     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4980CC59.1070302@gmail.com \
    --to=biggerbadderben@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox