From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_base: Add timeout for NAND reset command
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:45:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4989FE57.80404@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233778972.7067.261.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Peter Tyser wrote:
> The 25ns was calculated based on the addition of trp and trhoh from the
> Micron MT29F8G08 datasheet. Based on the timing diagram for a "Read
> Status" cycle I thought this would be the minimum cycle time needed to
> read the chip's status. Other chips (ST, Samsung) I glanced at had > 25
> ns read status times as well.
>
> I had tried using get_timer() (I believe nand_wait() would have been
> perfect to use), but that didn't work due to interrupts being disabled
> when NAND is probed. I didn't consider using get_ticks()... That seems
> much better. Is get_ticks() available for all platforms when NAND is
> initialized?
Probably, but who knows what weirdness is out there.
> Assuming get_ticks() is available for all platforms, would you prefer I:
> 1. re-do the patch using get_ticks()
> 2. update nand_wait() to use get_ticks instead of get_timer() and use it
#2 looks better.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-04 19:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_base: Add timeout for NAND reset command Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 19:54 ` Scott Wood
2009-02-04 20:22 ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 20:45 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2009-02-04 21:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-04 21:29 ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-04 21:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-04 21:31 ` Scott Wood
2009-02-04 21:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-02-05 16:33 ` Peter Tyser
2009-02-05 16:37 ` Scott Wood
2009-02-06 23:30 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4989FE57.80404@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox