From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:37:36 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand_base: Add timeout for NAND reset command
In-Reply-To: <1233851608.6434.2078.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1233776842-23379-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com>	
	<4989F25A.6090400@freescale.com>	
	<1233778972.7067.261.camel@localhost.localdomain>	
	<4989FE57.80404@freescale.com>
	<20090204212253.27C538322908@gemini.denx.de>	
	<498A0917.8080404@freescale.com>	
	<20090204215449.421DD8322908@gemini.denx.de>
	<1233851608.6434.2078.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <498B15D0.7080209@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> 
> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 22:54 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Scott,
>>
>> In message <498A0917.8080404@freescale.com> you wrote:
>>>> get_ticks() not a public interface. It should not be used in any
>>>> common code.
>>> Then what is it doing in include/common.h?
>>>
>>>> Please use get_timer().
>>> But as was pointed out, that depends on interrupts, and thus does not 
>>> work until very late in the boot process.
>> I see.
>>
>> But get_ticks() is an internal interface that may, or may not be
>> preset. There are architectures where it does not exist.
> 
> Since get_ticks() and get_timer() are not available, is the patch (hokey
> as it is) acceptable?

Yes, I'll apply it.

-Scott