From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:22:10 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] Add support for TQM-specific chip select logic to FSL-UPM In-Reply-To: <20090213205952.GB25384@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20090211173819.399651539@grandegger.com> <20090211173819.740828969@grandegger.com> <20090213205952.GB25384@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> Message-ID: <4995E482.30603@grandegger.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 06:38:22PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Index: u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c >> =================================================================== >> --- u-boot.orig/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c >> +++ u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c >> @@ -90,8 +90,11 @@ static void fun_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info >> mar = cmd << (32 - fun->width); >> io_addr = fun->upm.io_addr; >> #if CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS > 1 >> - if (fun->chip_nr > 0) >> + if (fun->chip_nr > 0) { >> io_addr += fun->chip_offset * fun->chip_nr; >> + if (fun->upm_mar_chip_offset) >> + mar |= fun->upm_mar_chip_offset * fun->chip_nr; >> + } > > Any particular reason not to drop the > 0 conditional? No, apart from saving some space. Should I send an updated patch? Wolfgang.