* [U-Boot] Timer on OMAP3430SDP.
@ 2009-03-08 3:53 Radha Krishna
2009-03-08 16:47 ` Dirk Behme
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Radha Krishna @ 2009-03-08 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi All,
I am using get_timer() function to find nof system ticks the NAND Read API is using. When I convert these system ticks into second I am not getting the expected value.
I observed that 1 sec = 50781 ticks on OMAP3430SDP.
Is this timer fine tuned for performance.
Could someone suggest me on this.
Thanks,
Krishna.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] Timer on OMAP3430SDP.
2009-03-08 3:53 [U-Boot] Timer on OMAP3430SDP Radha Krishna
@ 2009-03-08 16:47 ` Dirk Behme
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Behme @ 2009-03-08 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Krishna,
Radha Krishna wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using get_timer() function to find nof system ticks the NAND Read API is using. When I convert these system ticks into second I am not getting the expected value.
>
> I observed that 1 sec = 50781 ticks on OMAP3430SDP.
I can't remember that we have any OMAP3430SDP support in U-Boot
mainline. What U-Boot (patch) do you use?
> Is this timer fine tuned for performance.
>
>
> Could someone suggest me on this.
There was some discussion that there might be an issue with timer:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-February/048146.html
Can you check if this is the issue you see?
If yes, a patch for this is would be greatly appreciated!
Best regards
Dirk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-08 16:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-08 3:53 [U-Boot] Timer on OMAP3430SDP Radha Krishna
2009-03-08 16:47 ` Dirk Behme
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox