From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nishanth Menon <menon.nishanth@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:40:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] U-boot and JFFS2
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940427CBF3D5@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
References: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940427C52509@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
	<49BE3A69.6000402@gmail.com>
	<19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940427C52513@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
	<49BE3BAE.1080505@gmail.com>
	<19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940427CBF3D5@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Message-ID: <49BF37C1.50103@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Pillai, Manikandan said the following on 03/17/2009 06:41 AM:
> with u-boot as far as I can see but on the other hand the clean markers
> are also supposed to be in the same location.
>   
Why do you say that? ooblayout free is used if I am not wrong to store
cleanmarkers. have you compared the layouts of the kernel Vs u-boot? if
there is a delta, I suppose a good idea is to fix the kernel board file
(we've had more than enough oob discussions for omap3 gpmc i suppose on
u-boot ml ;) )..
> I am not clear on the other part of the answer. Do you mean to say I need to fix the kernel code for cleanmarker issue ? Is it like I can give an offset for the
> Cleanmarker to be written ?
>   
I believe you can, essentially coz you can choose where the ecc region
is, jffs2 should store cleanmarkers in free area.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon