From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Warren Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:46:57 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips In-Reply-To: <20090424214505.GA10032@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <200904121544.23683.david-b@pacbell.net> <200904162331.12314.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090424122407.7ddfed3c.hugo@hugovil.com> <200904241233.29872.david-b@pacbell.net> <20090424214505.GA10032@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <49F24F71.20405@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 12:33 Fri 24 Apr , David Brownell wrote: > >> On Friday 24 April 2009, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: >> >>> I would suggest renaming (or adding) CONFIG_SOC_DM6446 >>> to CONFIG_SOC_DM644x >>> >> The updated patchset I sent includes CONFIG_SOC_DM644X: >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051051.html >> >> I decided to keep the "X" uppercase for consistency >> with other CONFIG_* symbols, and Linux. >> > Ack > >> (Note: that series of five patches goes with two >> patches which seem not to have merged yet: >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050802.html >> > the Patch series and this has been apply in the u-boot-arm/next > > >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050800.html >> > this is throw Ben tree > > Actually, I asked you to pick it up: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051076.html If that's a problem let me know. regards, Ben