From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:17:36 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy,
	was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips
In-Reply-To: <200904241540.41719.david-b@pacbell.net>
References: <200904121544.23683.david-b@pacbell.net>	<200904241233.29872.david-b@pacbell.net>	<20090424214505.GA10032@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<200904241540.41719.david-b@pacbell.net>
Message-ID: <49F29CF0.1010304@googlemail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Jean-Christophe,

David Brownell wrote:
...
>>>   http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050802.html
>> the Patch series and this has been apply in the u-boot-arm/next
> 
> I see that branch now exists ... thanks!  :)
....
> Could you clarify the current merge cycle for me, by the way?
> I know u-boot has switched to 2009.{01,03,05,...} releases,
> which is a big win from where I sit!, with "rc" tags.
> 
> What I'm unclear on is what gets merged for 2009.05 versus
> later.  Are these "next" branches for the '05 release (which
> hasn't yet hit rc1)?  Or for '07 instead?

Yes, I have the same questions. I already tried to ask similar, but 
didn't get an answer.

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051111.html

Maybe my wording was a little unclear?

Dirk

Btw.: Now that -next exists, I can't find patch linked above in it, 
though :(