From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:11:07 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy,
 was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips
In-Reply-To: <200904242357.29469.david-b@pacbell.net>
References: <200904121544.23683.david-b@pacbell.net>
	<200904241540.41719.david-b@pacbell.net>
	<49F29CF0.1010304@googlemail.com>
	<200904242357.29469.david-b@pacbell.net>
Message-ID: <49F2B78B.7010607@googlemail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Btw.: Now that -next exists, I can't find patch linked above in it, 
>> though :(
> 
>   http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
> 
> shows it ... "respects SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT".  Make sure
> to look at the "next" branch there; you can start from
> 
>   http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git
> 
> Then page to the bottom, "heads" --> next, then shortlog.
> They're all there, except the dm9000 eeprom bugfix.

Sorry for being unclear. Yes, your Davinci patches are there. With 
'patch linked above' I meant

OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051111.html

which Jean-Christophe mentioned to apply against -next: "will be apply 
on the next".

Or did I miss it in

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next

again? Please correct me then (and send me some more coffee) ;)

Best regards

Dirk