From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:35:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F2F59A.80509@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090425104622.89B6383420E8@gemini.denx.de>
Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ben Warren,
>
> In message <49F2BED7.9070600@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>> - What about patches which are sent immediately after merge window
>>> closed (hours - 1 or 2 days)? I already heard something like 'no
>>> problem if it comes some hours later, if it is fine then I will still
>>> apply it'.
>>>
>> Well, since communication about the window state is rare at best, a good
>> argument can be made for flexibility here.
>
> While I agree on your comment on flexibility, I strongly repudiate
> the statement that the MW state is not clearly communicated. Please
> have a look at http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle
Ups, this link is new to me. Thanks for it :)
> and
> then tell me what exactly is not clear enough.
Yes, you are right, above link is quite clear.
While I didn't know above link, my way to get the recent merge window
info was to join IRC and to check the recent topic.
Now, talking above about wiki and IRC above, someone might get the
feeling 'and what's about the mailing list'? Maybe we can help people
by pushing the available info from IRC/wiki more actively into their
inboxes? (*)
I could imagine to have 4 or 5 points were an additional mail (besides
IRC/wiki update) would make sense:
- Some days before merge window opens "merge window opens in t days,
become ready"
- Version z created. Merge window is open. Will be open until ...
- Merge window will close in some days, please become ready
- Merge window closed now. Next merge window is planned for x, first
-rc is planned for y.
And if we want to make it perfect, each -rc could get a similar
announcement, too.
Please note that I don't want to say that this didn't happen in the
past. I just want to say that there might be the _feeling_ that the
info isn't there and that people are too lazy to search for it. And
with this more info on the mailing list could help.
Best regards
Dirk
(*) Well, most probably we should do it less often than RMK does post
his FAQs on arm-linux-kernel mailing list ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-25 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-12 22:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-17 5:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-17 6:31 ` David Brownell
2009-04-17 7:28 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-18 21:00 ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 16:24 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2009-04-24 19:33 ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 21:45 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-24 22:40 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 5:17 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: " Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 6:27 ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25 7:03 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 7:18 ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25 8:05 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 10:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:40 ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 12:55 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy David Brownell
2009-04-25 13:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:53 ` David Brownell
2009-04-26 21:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 13:44 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips Jerry Van Baren
2009-04-27 14:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 10:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 7:07 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 7:42 ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25 10:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:35 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-04-25 13:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 15:47 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-27 19:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-28 8:32 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-28 9:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 16:13 ` Ben Warren
2009-04-26 5:15 ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 10:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 17:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 17:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:02 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 18:55 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 6:57 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-25 7:11 ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-24 23:46 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] " Ben Warren
2009-04-25 0:36 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F2F59A.80509@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox