[U-Boot] Using Signed-off-by, was: OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision

[Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>]

Dear Jean-Christophe,

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 22:40 Fri 24 Apr     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>>
>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>> On 18:49 Fri 24 Apr     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>> Sanjeev Premi wrote:
>>>>> The function display_board_info() displays incorrect
>>>>> silicon revision - based on the return value from
>>>>> function get_cpu_rev().
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
>>> why the twice?
>> I wanted to mention that I helped developing these patches and that I  
>> tested them on real HW.
> what do you mean by help?
> review or dev?

Sorry, but I can't see what might be unclear with the string 'helped 
developing' I used regarding your question.

> if it's review I do not think the sob is correct

Please elaborate more why in review case you think sob is not correct?

Dirk