From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 10:36:51 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration
 for registers
In-Reply-To: <20090504215724.6F1AE83420E8@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1238769946-30370-1-git-send-email-dzu@denx.de>
	<49F2657D.5080706@ruby.dti.ne.jp> <m2ab62rz79.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
	<49F5C0AA.2000401@ruby.dti.ne.jp>
	<m2ljpmqfb2.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> <49F8A196.60202@pobox.com>
	<m28wlie38v.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> <49FA5790.3070200@pobox.com>
	<m2zldsanbe.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
	<20090504215724.6F1AE83420E8@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <49FF9833.6080405@pobox.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> We can easily ignore such boards of course, but it would be very nice
>>> for U-Boot if it could provide easy configurable drivers and could
>>> support as many hardwares as possible.
>> Currently it seems that all in-tree boards can be accomodated with the
>> construct that I suggested.  I am not at all sure that we want code
>> which is only used by out-of-tree ports.
>>
>> Post the port and we can rediscuss new code.
> 
> Full ACK here.  It makes no sense to spend time and resources on sup-
> porting out-of-tree ports on broken hardware.

Ok, that's fine by me.

Thanks for your comments,

  Shinya