From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:39:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A242071.1010806@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090601175808.BD41D832E416@gemini.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> there is an increasing number of postings with loooooong lists of
> recipients (10 addresses and more); usually several of these are
> regular and active users of this mailing list so this is actually
> redundant;
It is not redundant -- including a person in the CC list brings the mail
to their attention faster (and with less chances of missing it) than if
they have to pick it out of the list.
Though it seems that sometimes I don't get a copy delivered directly to
me, but only the list e-mail -- even though I'm in the CC. I think this
happens when the mail is sent from someone @denx.de, so the server
discards the duplicate, defeating the whole point of CCing a particular
person.
> for the remaining addresses question is if these people
> really need to be informed, and if so, if they should rather
> subscribe to the list (or if a company-internal mailing list address
> should be used instead).
>
> So far, I have manually ACKed all postings that were helt by the
> mailing list software because of too many recipients. From now on, I
> will not do this any more, but rather reject those messages.
How about reconfiguring the list software instead?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-01 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-01 17:58 [U-Boot] REJECT: Too many recipients to the message Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-01 18:39 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2009-06-01 18:47 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-06-01 18:50 ` Scott Wood
2009-06-01 20:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-01 20:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-01 20:32 ` T Ziomek
2009-06-01 20:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-01 21:08 ` T Ziomek
2009-06-01 22:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-06-01 22:27 ` Scott Wood
2009-06-02 0:09 ` T Ziomek
2009-06-02 6:53 ` Stefan Roese
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-02 2:52 HeungJun, Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A242071.1010806@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox