* [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch
@ 2009-06-04 11:42 Mark Jackson
2009-06-04 12:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Jackson @ 2009-06-04 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main
Denx (non-AVR32) git.
It consists of the following changes:-
cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/clk.c | 5 +
cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c | 90
+++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c | 5 +-
include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/chip-features.h | 5 +
include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/clk.h | 6 ++
include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/portmux.h | 5 +-
include/asm-avr32/global_data.h | 3 +
include/lcd.h | 2 +-
lib_avr32/board.c | 11 +++
9 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Can I submit this as a single patch (since it is *all* related to LCD
support), or should I split it up into lots of little patches ?
Regards
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch
2009-06-04 11:42 [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch Mark Jackson
@ 2009-06-04 12:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-06-04 13:46 ` Mark Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2009-06-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Mark Jackson wrote:
> I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main
> Denx (non-AVR32) git.
>
> It consists of the following changes:-
>
> cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/clk.c | 5 +
> cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c | 90
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c | 5 +-
> include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/chip-features.h | 5 +
> include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/clk.h | 6 ++
> include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/portmux.h | 5 +-
> include/asm-avr32/global_data.h | 3 +
> include/lcd.h | 2 +-
> lib_avr32/board.c | 11 +++
> 9 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Can I submit this as a single patch (since it is *all* related to LCD
> support), or should I split it up into lots of little patches ?
>
> Regards
> Mark
Hi Mark,
Don't agonize over it, just post the patch. The number of electrons you
kill by asking for direction/permission is roughly the same as the
number you kill by just submitting the patch. Just hit send already.
(Based on the above stats, that is a small patch. Hypothetically, it is
cohesive as well. We have insufficient information to throw any
hypothetical stones at it.)
Best regards,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch
2009-06-04 12:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2009-06-04 13:46 ` Mark Jackson
2009-06-04 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Jackson @ 2009-06-04 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 08:29 -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Mark Jackson wrote:
> > I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main
> > Denx (non-AVR32) git.
<snip>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Don't agonize over it, just post the patch. The number of electrons you
> kill by asking for direction/permission is roughly the same as the
> number you kill by just submitting the patch. Just hit send already.
>
> (Based on the above stats, that is a small patch. Hypothetically, it is
> cohesive as well. We have insufficient information to throw any
> hypothetical stones at it.)
Okay ... thanks
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch
2009-06-04 13:46 ` Mark Jackson
@ 2009-06-04 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2009-06-04 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Mark Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 08:29 -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Mark Jackson wrote:
>>> I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main
>>> Denx (non-AVR32) git.
>
> <snip>
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Don't agonize over it, just post the patch. The number of electrons you
>> kill by asking for direction/permission is roughly the same as the
>> number you kill by just submitting the patch. Just hit send already.
>>
>> (Based on the above stats, that is a small patch. Hypothetically, it is
>> cohesive as well. We have insufficient information to throw any
>> hypothetical stones at it.)
>
> Okay ... thanks
> Mark
P.S. I probably should have put a smiley in there somewhere. It was
meant to be more humorous than curmudgeonly. Thanks for not taking it
personally. ;-)
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-04 13:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-04 11:42 [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch Mark Jackson
2009-06-04 12:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-06-04 13:46 ` Mark Jackson
2009-06-04 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox