public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] 83xx 85xx: UEC: Implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:20:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A37FE9A.7090704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A37FB40.20907@RuggedCom.com>

Hi Richard,

Richard Retanubun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since rebasing to 2009.06 release, I have been getting this compiler warning
>
> cpu.c: In function 'cpu_eth_init':
> cpu.c:372: warning: implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init'
>
> It is declared in /drivers/qe/uec.h, crude hacks at including the header causes even more errors:
>
> In file included from cpu.c:35:
> ../../drivers/qe/uec.h:699: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'ucc_fast_info_t'
> ../../drivers/qe/uec.h:722: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'ucc_fast_private_t'
> In file included from cpu.c:37:
> /home/richardretanubun/workspace/u-boot/include/netdev.h:75: error: conflicting types for 'uec_initialize'
> ../../drivers/qe/uec.h:764: error: previous declaration of 'uec_initialize' was here
> make[1]: *** [cpu.o] Error 1
> make: *** [cpu/mpc83xx/libmpc83xx.a] Error 2
>
> The side effect I see so far is that the network interface can be used once (say for tftp) but fails after that.
>
> is there a patch missing for cpu.c?
>
> - Richard
>   
Looks like some networking code snuck in through the back door:

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=8e55258f144764de8902e9f078a7ad4c6c022c2f

include/netdev.h should contain the definitive public API for device 
initialization.

Does removing '#include "netdev.h' in cpu.c fix it?

regards,
Ben

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-16 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-16 20:06 [U-Boot] 83xx 85xx: UEC: Implicit declaration of function 'uec_standard_init' Richard Retanubun
2009-06-16 20:20 ` Ben Warren [this message]
2009-06-16 20:29   ` Richard Retanubun
2009-06-16 20:33     ` Ben Warren
2009-06-16 20:50       ` Richard Retanubun
2009-06-16 21:16         ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-17 12:27           ` Richard Retanubun
2009-06-17 13:15             ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-17 13:22         ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A37FE9A.7090704@gmail.com \
    --to=biggerbadderben@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox